Monday, June 30, 2014

AAS 2014- my time in the NITARP program comes to an end...

If you've been following my blog, you know I was lucky enough to be part of the NASA/IPAC Teacher Archive Research Program, or NITARP. It was an amazing year and the program wrapped up with a trip to the American Astronomical Society meeting with two of my students in January.

The AAS meeting was a ton of fun this year, just like last year. It was way colder, but a ton of fun. I’m glad I had students with me, but it was definitely more difficult to plan sessions and posters to see with students who didn’t have a huge astronomy background. They were great at the science we did and I could see light bulbs any time any one mentioned light curves or Kepler… but some of it went right over our heads (myself included).


Our time at AAS 223 started with a trip to the opening reception. It put me and my students a bit out of our comfort zone. I’m not super good at mingling and high schoolers are usually super uncomfortable with just walking up to adults they don’t know, but we managed alright. Probably my favorite moment was when one of my students walked up to a professor from Vassar (where she’ll be going in the fall) and introduced herself. She’s usually pretty quiet, so I was really excited that she at least said hi.

Our second day was very very busy, especially because our poster was up!  We started with the Plenary Session with Robert Williams from the Space Telescope Science Institute about the Hubble Deep Field. If you don’t know about the Hubble Deep Field, you should! The photo was taken in 1995 and at the time was not very popular because it was pretty risky. The results however, are amazing, and the photo contains more than 3,000 objects, most of which are galaxies. Why is it so important? As Robert Williams said during the session: "if you want to understand the present, look into the past." If you’d like to learn more about the Hubble Deep Field, check out this really cool NASA resource: http://hubblesite.org/hubble_discoveries/hubble_deep_field/  

We also checked out the “Planet Hunters” session, which was a really cool view of exoplanet astronomy and citizen science with Dr. Meg Schwamb. If you’d like to look for exoplanets by studying stellar variability or as she said, “flicker, jitter, and crackle” be sure to check out http://www.planethunters.org/. Citizen science really is great. During the session, she said that there have been 20 million classifications by 280,000 people since 2010. Also, the Planet Hunters ‘Talk’ feature is like facebook for light curves. Conversation and collaboration is huge in citizen science.  

Next, we visited the Kepler town hall, which the students were very excited about because we used Kepler data to do our research. They had an updated graph of exoplanets found with Kepler (which has now been updated again and you can see here: http://www.nasa.gov/content/sizes-of-known-exoplanets/#.U7HXj5RdWSo). The K2 mission was the highlight of the town hall, because Kepler’s reaction wheels went a little funky, the telescope couldn’t really keep doing what it was doing, but scientists were able to figure out another way to do the science, and now, it is! (I still think if NASA could have figured out a way to get Mike Massimino up there, he somehow would have been able to fix it. I’ve seen that Hubble movie at Kennedy Space Center a bunch of times.)

After a full first day, our even started with us talking at our poster! All of our other team members took the morning shift, but we had the last one… and it was AWESOME. So many people stopped by to talk with us and the students had a great time meeting people, answering questions and talking all about our research. Everyone seemed pretty impressed, and a few people even asked us if we were going to publish our results! Once the time was up my students and I thought that we wished we had more time. Talking to everyone was way more fun than we expected (we were pretty nervous at the beginning!). It was definitely a little weird to feel like we just squeezed a whole year of work and research and red giants into one poster and one day of talking to people...but I guess that's science, right?  Just in case you still haven't seen our poster, you can check it out here! http://nitarp.ipac.caltech.edu/system/media_files/binaries/130/original/miller14.pdf?1387236406



Then we headed to a NITARP meeting/discussion session/photo shoot with everyone in the program and right to something I was pretty excited about, “Tales from the Twitterverse and other Media Excursions” with Neil deGrasse Tyson. If you were on twitter and following along that night, you know that Dr. Tyson did not impress everyone, but my students and I thought it was great. I thought he followed along pretty closely with the description in the program and my takeaway was that social media can be very powerful, if used the right way. (My other takeaway was that sometimes if you make one person mad, lots of people on twitter will join in on the mad – even if they’re not there.) Dr. Tyson shared a great story with us about how learned his lesson about communication after an interview with a local news station. He said he gave them a great interview, but because he didn’t talk in sound bites, they only took one part, something about him saying stars wobble – while doing a little dance. The dance was all they showed. From then on, he decided to only speak in sound bites, which translates very well to twitter’s 140 character thing. He also focused on using humor to communicate science, which is where I think some people were offended. He did use some colorful language, but he warned us about it at the beginning, and I didn’t feel like it was stuff my students couldn’t handle, they hear things much worse in the hallways at school, for sure. According to this website which was shared on twitter that night, Neil Tyson has way more followers on twitter than all the other astronomy folks combined. http://lucretius21c.wordpress.com/astronomers-on-twitter/  

My final tweet that night was this: 

@d_l_miller: take away from @neiltyson at #aas223? Use twitter (and other social media) for good. Make science accessible. The people will make it cool.



Our third day started off with running into Neil deGrasse Tyson on the escalator (no, really!) and a few more sessions. We started with “Observing Asteroids for Fun and (Astronomical) Profit” with Linda French, which was a great Amateur talk that both my students and I found interesting and easy to understand. We learned about how asteroids can reveal lots of things about the early solar system and that, according to Linda French “light can move mountains in space,” it’s called the Yarkovsky effect…and it’s really cool. Even though our research was with Kepler, we learned about Spitzer during our time at Caltech in the summer, so we also went to the “Spitzer Space Telescope: The Next Ten Years” session. The scientists estimate that even though it’s been going strong, Spitzer can continue to make observations until 2018 or so. If you haven’t been keeping up with Spitzer news, you really should! Cold brown dwarfs, exoplanet atmospheres and interiors, young stars, supernovae, galaxies, clusters… it’s awesome! You can learn more at: http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/   One thing I noticed during that session though, was that each of the presenters- even though doing very different - all said something along the lines of “before Spitzer, we couldn’t do this.” Isn’t science great?




Next, we went to the NASA Education and Public Outreach Event with the director of NASA’s Astrophysics Division, Paul Hertz. Because the room was mostly full of local students, it wasn’t super high level science, but he did make sure to communicate to the students that STEM is important, that no one at NASA works alone- collaboration is key, and that science is always changing. We then walked around the exhibit hall for the education presentations, and stopped at a few really cool booths. We saw a robotic model of the JWST, talked to the Chandra x-ray folks, and learned a bunch from the William Patterson University Astronomy club. The NASA town hall we went to next was pretty enlightening…the James Webb telescope is a really big deal, in case you didn’t know. At the end, someone in the audience asked about education and public outreach (if you’ve been following along you know is in an…interesting…place right now) and the answer was a very quick “talk to congress.” So, people, talk to congress! Our brains were pretty full by that point, so we decided to take a quick ride on a boat on the frozen Potomac. Later in the evening, we attended a star party in less than favorable single-digit weather for us ladies from Florida. Luckily, there was hot chocolate, and a few trips to just inside the convention center doors so we could sit directly on top of the heaters. We were able to see  Jupiter with its moons and our moon up close, plus we took some really cool photos with my just my iPhone held up to the eyepiece of the telescope! 




On the next day, we managed to get into Washington, DC. My teacher self would have felt pretty bad about bringing 2 students who had never been before to right outside the nation’s capital without at least running through. So we did a whirlwind few hour trip to the Air and Space Museum (which had a really cool Spirit and Opportunity exhibit), the Natural History Museum, outside the fence of the White House, past the Washington Monument, into the American History museum and then back to the hotel. Yes, our feet hurt. Yes, it was very cold - in the teens, I think. But it was also very fun and full of learning new things for all of us.



The last day there were lots of education posters up – lots of cool resources – and we went to a few talks on stellar evolution, but by then my students and I were pretty tired and overwhelmed by everything. Our trip back went well and it was time to dive right back in to teaching and my team’s robotics league championship the next day. The girls did a lot of work while I was away, so we made it states for the second year in a row.



I procrastinated on this blog for awhile… and as I sit here finally finishing it, I know why. I just don’t want NITARP to be over.  And even though NITARP may be over for me, it could be just starting for you! The application for 2015 is available here: http://nitarp.ipac.caltech.edu/news_item/408 and is due on September 22nd. Go on, apply…for SCIENCE! 

Thursday, June 12, 2014

on failing.

What does it mean to fail?

On the day of finals, my students and I watched this great PBS nova movie on the Curiosity Mission. Part of the movie was about testing that was done on the parachute. I had no idea that the first parachute test was terrible. .Terrible might not even be a terrible enough word. You can watch the segment here: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/space/ultimate-mars-challenge.html  at around 14:45. What struck me most though, was not how upset the failure made the scientists, it was that they tried the parachute again and again and again and got more and more upset every time it worked. What? The only time cheering happened was on the test when it failed again. Why? Because collecting data from a failure helps you understand why it failed and make sure the conditions that caused the failure don’t happen again.

I’ve been sitting on this idea for awhile now, and I thought I would finally try to put it into words. Curiosity was only the first thing that got me really thinking about failure. Then this tweet came along:

@SolutionTree RT @jdsnwg: NASA scientist leading PD states that in his work they get criticized for not failing. Language used "failing forward."

I’m not sure who the scientist was, or what the Professional Development was about, but there it is, again. Failure can be used for good. Failure is necessary.

Then, my Sunday night routine for the past few months of watching Cosmos hit me with the truth about failure, yet again. Neil deGrasse Tyson – with his awesome voice – said:
“Failure is an excuse to work harder, not an excuse to abandon …pursuits.”
 “If you aren’t failing somewhere in your life you aren’t moving a frontier in your life.”

Another view of failure being something that motivates, something that inspires, something that makes you want to be better.

I’ve been thinking about failure so much lately for some personal reasons. I’ve had 3 failures recently, in the form of rejection emails for programs or opportunities I really wanted to be involved in. First, the rejection email came from the Lunar and Planetary institute that I wasn’t accepted into the EXMASS research program for my students: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/exploration/education/hsResearch/. Then, I got an email that I didn’t get chosen to attend the celebration of the 10th anniversary of Honeywell Space Camp for educators (I knew it was a long shot- hundreds of applications, only 10 spots). Since I’ve been to Huntsville for one reason or another the past 3 summers, it was disappointing. I really love Huntsville, and for some reason feel like it’s somewhere I belong… at least for a few days every year.  The most recent rejection was for the internship I had last summer. I applied again with what I thought was an even better resume, but it was a no this time. This one felt the worst  because I feel my rejection has something to do with what I did last year. Logically, I think it’s just because they wanted someone different. Personally, I feel that I didn’t do a good job.

I’m a reasonable person, and I know there are a lot of places where I shouldn’t feel like I’m failing. It’s just been difficult these past few weeks because I’ve constantly been reminded of my failure every time someone asked me if I was going back to NASA this summer. Just a few hours ago, I had texts from 2 different co-workers who assumed I was working there and sent shocked texts right back (the text literally read: “WHAAAT????? No NASA???”) when I told them I wasn’t there. I guess I should take it as a compliment that it’s assumed I’m doing awesome things, but it’s disappointing that I’m not. (On a related note, I do have a summer job that's paying me well.)

But enough about me. What about our students? I’ve been thinking about students and failure for awhile now, thanks in part to an amazing  co-worker who is shaking things up with big ideas. If you haven’t seen his TED talk yet- http://youtu.be/BnC6IABJXOI -definitely worth 17 of your minutes. But if I as a teacher, an adult, a reasonably smart person has been feeling a sense of failure for the past few weeks, what are we doing to these students? Third graders? High schoolers? How do expect them to keep coming back for 180 days a year to take tests they know they are going to fail -sometimes fail again? The standardized tests are written so a certain number of students will not pass. Our teacher evaluation is based on test scores… do you  see a problem already? I do.

How do you see failure? Necessary or evil? Helpful or harmful? Motivational or destructive? What does it really mean to fail?